The English Center Miami Student Defense Lawyer
The English Center is a public technical and adult education centre operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, in Miami-Dade County. It participates in federal student aid. Because it is a public institution, a dispute here is analysed differently from a dispute with any of the private career schools in this county — and that difference works in your favour. Federal disputes go to the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.
Being a public school changes the foundation of your case
Almost every other postsecondary institution in Miami-Dade that I write about here is private, which means the student’s claim rests on contract — the enrolment agreement, the catalogue, the handbook. The English Center is different. It is operated by a district school board, which makes it a state actor, and that means the Fourteenth Amendment applies to it. Where you have a protected interest in continued enrolment, the school owes you constitutional due process in addition to whatever its own procedures promise. That is a materially stronger position than a student at a private school across the street has, and it is the reason it matters that you identify what kind of institution you attended before anyone advises you.
The statute that protects state college students does not cover you
Fla. Stat. section 1006.60 — five business days’ advance written notice of the charges, access to inculpatory and exculpatory information, an impartial hearing officer — applies by its own terms to Florida College System institutions and state universities. A district technical college is neither: it is a public school operated by a district school board under sections 1001.44 and 1003.02. Sections 1006.61, 1006.62 and 1002.21 are limited the same way. So a student here gets none of the statutory protections a student at the state college down the road gets.
What you have instead is constitutional, and the Eleventh Circuit has addressed this exact setting. Castle v. Appalachian Technical College, 631 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2011) — a nursing student at a public technical college — proceeded on the footing that the student held a property interest in continued enrolment that could not be taken without due process, and recorded that denying a pre-suspension hearing is itself a violation. Wells v. Columbus Technical College, 510 F. App’x 893 (11th Cir. 2013), applied Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), to a technical college suspension. Goss requires notice and an opportunity to respond before the sanction takes effect.
If the college calls the dismissal academic, Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978), removes the hearing requirement — but only where the institution evaluated the student carefully and deliberately and kept them informed of the deficiency and of the risk of dismissal. A competency-based dismissal is usually labelled academic for that reason, which is why the label is worth contesting.
The board has to decide, and often has not
Because no statute writes a conduct code for adult career-centre students — section 1006.07(2) is written for elementary and middle and high schools — the governing document is the district school board’s own rules, adopted under section 1001.41(2) and section 1003.02(1)(c), which expressly covers adult and career education programmes. Get the board policy, not only the college handbook.
And the decisive procedural point: per Fla. Att’y Gen. Op. 2001-05, a board may delegate the evidentiary hearing to a qualified hearing officer, but the final expulsion decision must be made by the board itself and cannot be delegated. In practice these removals are frequently handled inside the college by a director or a programme committee and the board never votes. Where that happened there is a structural defect to raise that does not require relitigating the facts.
Review is by petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court under Fla. R. App. P. 9.190(b)(3), within 30 days of rendition under Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(1). The court asks whether due process was afforded, whether the essential requirements of law were observed and whether competent substantial evidence supported the decision — it does not reweigh evidence, so the record has to be built inside the board process.
English for Speakers of Other Languages, and what that adds
The Center’s identity is built around language instruction alongside its career and technical programmes, and that produces two issues worth raising specifically. First, if a disciplinary or dismissal process was conducted in English with a student whose enrolment is premised on learning English, the adequacy of notice becomes a real question rather than a technical one. Due process requires notice a person can actually understand, and a notice delivered in a language the school knows the student is still acquiring is vulnerable on exactly that ground. Ask in writing whether interpretation or a translated notice was offered, and record what you are told.
Second, if you have a documented disability, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act applies because the district receives federal financial assistance, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies because it is a public entity — Title II, not Title III, which is the private-school provision. The district also has an established special education and 504 apparatus that a small private school does not, which means there is a documented accommodations process to point to, and a documented failure to follow it is a stronger claim than an argument about what would have been reasonable.
What can a student defense lawyer do here?
- Obtain the district school board policy as well as the college handbook, and hold the college to whichever is more demanding.
- Establish whether the school board itself decided the expulsion, or whether the college did it alone.
- Contest the academic-versus-disciplinary characterisation, because it sets how much process was owed.
- Test the Horowitz minimum: was the deficiency identified in writing, and was the student warned that dismissal was possible?
- Preserve the 30-day certiorari window from rendition.
Related pages
Florida district technical colleges and career centres · Florida student defence
Other Florida colleges
Every school writes its own dismissal, appeal and conduct rules, and the filing deadlines are rarely the same from one campus to the next. These pages set out the procedure at other Florida colleges:
- Trinity Baptist College
- TSC Ghazvini Center for Healthcare Education
- UNF
- UTI Orlando
- UWF
- Valencia College
Common questions about The English Center cases
Is The English Center a public or private school?
Public. It is operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools under a district school board, which makes it a state actor. That is the single most important fact about your case, because it means constitutional due process applies in addition to the school’s own procedures — a stronger position than a student at a private career school has.
Does section 1006.60 protect me?
No, and this is the trap. Section 1006.60 — with its five business days’ written notice, access to inculpatory and exculpatory information and an impartial hearing officer — applies by its terms to Florida College System institutions and state universities. A district-operated technical and adult centre is neither; it is a public school under sections 1001.44 and 1003.02. Your protection comes from the Constitution and from the district’s own board policy instead.
My notice was in English and I am enrolled to learn English. Does that matter?
It can matter a great deal. Due process requires notice a person can actually understand, and notice delivered in a language the school knows the student is still acquiring is vulnerable on precisely that ground. Ask in writing whether interpretation or a translated notice was offered, and record the answer.
Which disability law applies here?
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, because the district receives federal financial assistance, and Title II of the ADA, because the district is a public entity — Title II rather than the Title III provision that covers private schools. The district also has an established accommodations apparatus, so there is a documented process whose breach you can point to.
Where do I complain if the school will not fix it?
A district-operated school answers to the school board, so the board policy and the district’s own grievance chain come first, and they are genuine routes rather than formalities. The Commission for Independent Education does not regulate public schools, so that is not your forum. For disability issues, the Office for Civil Rights takes complaints directly.
Which court would hear a case?
Miami-Dade County is in the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. Unlike private career schools, a district school is unlikely to have an arbitration clause in its enrolment paperwork, so the courthouse is a realistic forum here in a way it often is not elsewhere.