Big Bend Technical College Dismissal Lawyer

Big Bend Technical College in Perry is operated by the Taylor County School District, and it is one of the few district technical colleges reporting both a practical-nursing and a diploma RN programme.

Above the statutory floor in 2025

The practical-nursing programme passed 92.86% of 28 first-time candidates in 2025 against a 77.17% floor under Fla. Stat. section 464.019(5)(a)1, clearing it by about 15.7 points. A result above the line removes a set of arguments the college might otherwise make: it cannot attribute a dismissal to an unprepared cohort, and it is under no statutory pressure to protect a marginal pass rate. The question narrows to whether it followed its own published progression and conduct rules — and whether the school board, rather than the college, made the final decision.

Two nursing programmes, two statutory floors

Big Bend reports a practical-nursing code that passed 92.86% of 28 in 2025 and a small diploma RN code that passed 100% of 9. That matters procedurally: the two are measured against different floors under Fla. Stat. section 464.019(5)(a)1 — 77.17% for practical nursing and 73.37% for diploma RN programmes in 2025 — and they may run separate handbooks with separate progression and appeal rules. Establishing which programme a student was in comes first.

The statute that protects state college students does not cover you

Fla. Stat. section 1006.60 — five business days’ advance written notice of the charges, access to inculpatory and exculpatory information, an impartial hearing officer — applies by its own terms to Florida College System institutions and state universities. A district technical college is neither: it is a public school operated by a district school board under sections 1001.44 and 1003.02. Sections 1006.61, 1006.62 and 1002.21 are limited the same way. So a student here gets none of the statutory protections a student at the state college down the road gets.

What you have instead is constitutional, and the Eleventh Circuit has addressed this exact setting. Castle v. Appalachian Technical College, 631 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2011) — a nursing student at a public technical college — proceeded on the footing that the student held a property interest in continued enrolment that could not be taken without due process, and recorded that denying a pre-suspension hearing is itself a violation. Wells v. Columbus Technical College, 510 F. App’x 893 (11th Cir. 2013), applied Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), to a technical college suspension. Goss requires notice and an opportunity to respond before the sanction takes effect.

If the college calls the dismissal academic, Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978), removes the hearing requirement — but only where the institution evaluated the student carefully and deliberately and kept them informed of the deficiency and of the risk of dismissal. A competency-based dismissal is usually labelled academic for that reason, which is why the label is worth contesting.

The board has to decide, and often has not

Because no statute writes a conduct code for adult career-centre students — section 1006.07(2) is written for elementary and middle and high schools — the governing document is the district school board’s own rules, adopted under section 1001.41(2) and section 1003.02(1)(c), which expressly covers adult and career education programmes. Get the board policy, not only the college handbook.

And the decisive procedural point: per Fla. Att’y Gen. Op. 2001-05, a board may delegate the evidentiary hearing to a qualified hearing officer, but the final expulsion decision must be made by the board itself and cannot be delegated. In practice these removals are frequently handled inside the college by a director or a programme committee and the board never votes. Where that happened there is a structural defect to raise that does not require relitigating the facts.

Review is by petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court under Fla. R. App. P. 9.190(b)(3), within 30 days of rendition under Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(1). The court asks whether due process was afforded, whether the essential requirements of law were observed and whether competent substantial evidence supported the decision — it does not reweigh evidence, so the record has to be built inside the board process.

Where a case is filed

Perry is in Taylor County, which puts a federal claim in the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division. Certiorari review of the school board’s decision lies in the circuit court for the Third Judicial Circuit.

What can a student defense lawyer do here?

  • Obtain the district school board policy as well as the college handbook, and hold the college to whichever is more demanding.
  • Establish whether the school board itself decided the expulsion, or whether the college did it alone.
  • Contest the academic-versus-disciplinary characterisation, because it sets how much process was owed.
  • Test the Horowitz minimum: was the deficiency identified in writing, and was the student warned that dismissal was possible?
  • Preserve the 30-day certiorari window from rendition.

The full framework, and every Florida district technical college nursing programme with its 2025 result, is on the Florida district technical college page. Programme-level pass rates are tabulated on the Florida nursing programme pass-rate page.

Other Florida technical and career institutions

Every school writes its own dismissal, appeal and conduct rules, and the filing deadlines are rarely the same from one campus to the next. These pages set out the procedure at other Florida technical and career institutions:

Common questions about Big Bend Technical College cases

What was Big Bend Technical College’s nursing pass rate?

92.86% of 28 first-time practical-nursing candidates in 2025, against a statutory floor of 77.17%.

Does Fla. Stat. 1006.60 apply to Big Bend Technical College?

No. That section applies to Florida College System institutions and state universities. This is a public school operated by the Taylor County School District, so your protections come from the Fourteenth Amendment — see Castle v. Appalachian Technical College, an Eleventh Circuit case about a nursing student at a public technical college — and from the board’s own adopted rules.

Who has to make the final decision to expel me?

The district school board. Per Fla. Att’y Gen. Op. 2001-05 a board may delegate the evidentiary hearing to a hearing officer, but the final expulsion decision must be made by the board and cannot be delegated. These removals are often handled inside the college with no board vote, which is a concrete defect worth raising.

How long do I have to challenge the decision?

Thirty days from rendition, by petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court under Fla. R. App. P. 9.190(b)(3) and 9.100(c)(1). The court reviews due process, the essential requirements of law and whether competent substantial evidence supported the decision — it does not reweigh the evidence.