Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine Student Defense Lawyer
Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine students in Fort Smith call me for the reasons students call from every osteopathic program: a failed block or course that triggers promotions review, a clerkship evaluation that arrived late and badly, a professionalism referral, an academic standing decision with a committee date attached. ARCOM is the first program developed by Arkansas Colleges of Health Education, a private not-for-profit institution accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, which now also runs occupational therapy, physical therapy, physician associate, biomedicine, and public health programs on the same campus. That matters procedurally: the document governing your case is your program’s handbook, and institutional policies sit above it rather than replacing it.
Overview
ARCOM is part of a private institution, so there is no Fourteenth Amendment due-process claim available against it. Arguing one wastes the appeal. The relationship is contractual: the student handbook, the academic standing and promotions policies, the clinical education manual, and the technical standards are the promise, and the question is whether the college kept it. That framework is developed on my breach of contract against universities page.
Federal law still applies. Title IX reaches sexual-misconduct proceedings at any school taking federal funds, Section 504 and the ADA govern accommodations — including in clinical settings — and FERPA gives you the right to inspect most of what sits in your education record.
The substance is governed by the academic-deference principle. Under Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978), and Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (1985), courts defer substantially to academic and clinical evaluation, asking whether professional judgment was exercised rather than whether it was exercised correctly. So the argument is documentary: what the handbook promised, what actually happened, and where the gap is. Those are also the questions that matter to the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation, which requires programs to publish their academic and disciplinary procedures and apply them consistently. ARCOM was granted Accreditation with Exceptional Outcome by COCA in April 2025, the highest status COCA awards, for a ten-year term — which is worth knowing, because a program operating under that status has a particular interest in the consistency of its own processes.
Where ARCOM cases come from
The recurring sources are preclinical course and block failures that trigger promotions review; clerkship evaluations from regional sites, where a single preceptor’s late-written impression can decide a rotation; COMLEX-USA attempts and the progression rules attached to them; attendance, documentation, and communication issues recharacterized as professionalism concerns; and accommodations approved on paper that are never implemented in a clinical setting.
Because ACHE runs several health-professions programs on one campus, students sometimes receive documents that mix institutional policy with program policy. Sorting that out early is not pedantry — it determines which appeal route applies and which deadline is real. Dismissal and remediation disputes follow my medical school dismissal and remediation page; rotation disputes follow my page on clinical, rotation, and externship failures; board-exam accommodation requests run through the USMLE and COMLEX accommodations page.
Which process you are in matters
A promotions or progression decision, a professionalism referral, an academic integrity allegation, and a Title IX complaint are separate processes with different decision-makers, deadlines, and rules about who may accompany you. Identify which one you are in before writing anything, because that determines what the college owes you. See professionalism and fitness concerns, academic dismissal and suspension, and academic misconduct and honor code.
What to do first
Pull the current ARCOM student handbook and academic policies from the college’s own site rather than relying on any summary, including this one — the grading and evaluation policy, the promotions and progression policy, the remediation policy, the appeal policy, and the technical standards. Confirm which version applies to your class year, and confirm in writing whether any institution-level ACHE policy is being applied to your matter.
Then calendar the deadline in writing. Request your file, including every clerkship evaluation, preceptor comment, and item the committee will consider. Preserve rotation schedules, correspondence with the clinical education office, accommodation approvals, and messages before they age out. And do not appear before a committee or submit a statement until you understand what the college claims to have. The meeting framed as an opportunity to explain is the meeting that produces the record used later.
What I can help with
- Reading the governing policy against the charge or decision letter
- Helping you prepare your account, your documents, and your questions
- Testing whether ARCOM followed its own published procedures
- Scrutinizing software-based evidence, including AI-detection and similarity reports
- Assisting with the written response and appeal, to the extent the policy permits
- Serving as your advisor where the process allows it
- Negotiating sanction terms, notations, and disclosure language
What a lawyer may actually do in your case depends on that school’s policy. Some tracks allow counsel to participate directly, some allow a non-participating advisor, and some allow no outside person at all. Reading the current policy is the first step, because it determines what form the assistance can take.
Common questions
Does it help to raise accreditation standards in an appeal?
Sometimes, when it is done precisely and without threats. An appeal that identifies the specific published procedure the program skipped, quoting the program’s own language, reads very differently from an appeal that asks for another chance. A college that has certified the consistency of its procedures to its accreditor tends to have that appeal read at a different level. Complaints to an accreditor are a separate step with their own sequencing considerations, and they are not a substitute for the campus process.
I failed one rotation on one evaluation. Can that be challenged?
Not by disputing the evaluator’s opinion, which carries little weight. It is challenged with documentation: the published criteria differ from the criteria applied, the mid-rotation feedback the policy requires never happened, the evaluation was written long after the fact and conflicts with contemporaneous records, the remediation step in the handbook was skipped, or an approved accommodation was never implemented. See disability accommodations under Section 504 and the ADA.
If I withdraw instead of being dismissed, does that solve the problem?
Sometimes it helps, and sometimes it simply changes the label on a record that residency applications and licensing questionnaires will still reach. Whether a negotiated withdrawal is better than contesting a dismissal depends on what the file already contains and what the school is willing to put in writing. A flat-fee record review is described on the fees and scope of services page.
Related Arkansas pages: NYITCOM at Arkansas State, UAMS, Alice L. Walton School of Medicine, and Arkansas Tech University. The full list is on the Arkansas student defense index.
This is general information about the matters I handle and the law that applies to them. It is not legal advice about your situation, and the law in this area can change. For advice on your matter, start with the Full Read + Game Plan — your entire file read, straight answers, and exactly what to do next, in what order.
This page is informational and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the institution named on it.
Attorney advertising. Zachary Gaynor is admitted in Florida and its federal courts, not in Arkansas; Arkansas matters are handled through the framework described on the nationwide practice page — federal-law assessment, campus-process support where the school’s policy permits an advisor, and association with local counsel or pro hac vice admission where required.