Bentley University Student Defense Lawyer
Bentley students call about integrity allegations more often than about anything else, and the reason is structural. A business curriculum built on case analysis, team deliverables, and spreadsheet work produces documents that look alike by design, and automated similarity screening does not distinguish between a required template and copied work. The second most common call is about what a finding will do to a recruiting pipeline that begins in sophomore year.
Overview
Bentley is a private university in Waltham, so there is no constitutional due process claim available: the Fourteenth Amendment reaches state action, and Bentley is not the state. The relationship is contractual. The student handbook, the academic integrity policy, the catalog, and — for graduate students in the McCallum Graduate School of Business — the program handbook are the promises the university made about how it would handle a matter like yours, and the case is built on whether it kept them. See breach of contract against universities.
Federal law applies regardless of private status. Title IX, Section 504, the ADA, and FERPA reach Bentley because it receives federal funding, and those obligations exist independently of what the handbook promises. The useful arguments generally sit between the two.
Where Bentley cases come from
Team assignments and case competitions where the division of labor was never documented and one member’s shortcut becomes everyone’s allegation; quantitative coursework where a shared model or template produces near-identical output; AI-detection and similarity referrals across the writing-intensive core; and conduct matters in residential and organizational life. Graduate business students generate a separate stream involving academic standing, progression, and — for international students — enrollment consequences that arrive on a schedule the conduct process does not control. Integrity cases resting on a software score are covered on the academic misconduct and honor code page.
Which process you are in matters
An academic integrity referral, a student conduct charge, a Title IX complaint, and an academic standing decision are separate systems at Bentley with separate deadlines and separate decision-makers, and the label on your letter determines which rules apply to you. Establish that before you write anything: student conduct, Title IX, or academic dismissal and suspension.
What to do first
Pull the current academic integrity policy and student handbook from Bentley’s own site rather than relying on a summary, this page included, and use the edition in effect for your cohort. Read the syllabus and the assignment instructions next to the policy, because in team-based coursework the assignment text is usually the document that decides whether the collaboration was permitted.
Then calendar the deadline in writing, request your file, and preserve drafts, file version histories, shared-document revision logs, and the group messages in which the work was divided. Those messages are frequently the strongest exculpatory material in a team-assignment case, and they are also the material students delete first. Do not sit for an interview until you understand what the university claims to have; a separate charge for dishonesty during the process is common and is usually easier to prove than the original allegation.
What I can help with
- Reading the governing policy against the charge or decision letter
- Helping you prepare your account, your documents, and your questions
- Testing whether Bentley followed its own published procedures
- Scrutinizing software-based evidence, including AI-detection and similarity reports
- Assisting with the written response and appeal, to the extent the policy permits
- Serving as your advisor where the process allows it
- Negotiating sanction terms, notations, and disclosure language
What a lawyer may actually do in your case depends on that school’s policy. Some processes allow counsel to participate, some allow a non-participating advisor, and some allow no outside person at all. Reading the current policy is the first step, and it determines what form the assistance can take.
Common questions
My whole team was charged. Should we respond together?
Almost never. Team members in an integrity case have divergent interests the moment anyone’s contribution differs from anyone else’s, and a joint statement locks all of you into one version of events that may serve only the person who did the least. Each student needs their own record and their own account, drawn from their own documents.
Will an integrity finding show up in recruiting?
Not automatically, but the disclosure questions are what matter. Internship and full-time applications, background checks in regulated industries, graduate program applications, and professional licensure questionnaires ask about disciplinary findings whether or not a transcript reflects anything. The wording of the resolution is what those readers see, and that wording is negotiable while the matter is open.
I am an international student. What changes?
The timing. A suspension or a drop below full-time enrollment can affect status independently of the disciplinary outcome, and that consequence often arrives before the appeal is decided. It has to be part of the plan from the first day. The reasons to move early are set out in Do Not Underestimate Your School.
Other Massachusetts schools: Babson, Brandeis, Boston College, and Northeastern. The full list is on the Massachusetts student defense index.
This is general information about the matters I handle and the law that applies to them. It is not legal advice about your situation, and the law in this area can change. For advice on your matter, start with the Full Read + Game Plan — your entire file read, straight answers, and exactly what to do next, in what order.
This page is informational and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the institution named on it.
Attorney advertising. Zachary Gaynor is admitted in Florida and its federal courts, not in Massachusetts; Massachusetts matters are handled through the framework described on the nationwide practice page — federal-law assessment, campus-process support where the school’s policy permits an advisor, and association with local counsel or pro hac vice admission where required.